Updated: In view of the comment of RS, I have removed email addresses.
While in general I agree with his observation, I do not think any one
would mind their mail being displayed when it is about paying respect
to the work of another scientist. It is like quoting from an article.
I do not see why any one would object.
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 15:52:25 +0530 (IST)
Subject: Raychaudhuri
Dear Dr. Buchert,
I enjoyed the seminar you presented at Lausanne last week, although i know
very little about the subject. I was pleasantly surprised to know that the
work of A. K. Raychaudhuri continues to be of use in modern research. You
may be interested (from a human interest angle) in the following:
http://www.ias.ac.in/resonance/April2008.htm (click here)
I hope some of the articles are to your liking.
Sincerely,
B. Ananthanarayan
------------
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 13:26:42 +0200
Subject: Re: Raychaudhuri
Dear college,
I am pleased to learn that you enjoyed the talk. Of course,
Raychaudhuri's equation is key to many research questions.
I actually saw some of these articles, and thank you for
sending me this site.
Best
Thomas
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Centre de Recherche Astrophysique de Lyon UCBL / CNRS UMR 5574 / ENS
9, avenue Charles Andre F-69230 Saint-Genis-Laval
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I'm a bit late commenting, but -- even if Dr Buchert is OK with his private emails being posted on the internet -- it is really not good form to post his unobfuscated email address, phone numbers, and mobile number as well. Unless you have his explicit permission.
Rahul: I have removed the email and
phone numbers. In any case all his contact info. is on the web. However I do not agree that this is private email. It is just about paying homage to a great piece of work.
Post a Comment